Collective vs. individual in today's thinking (marxism, socialism, feminism and many other isms.., "utopianism"). Auguste Comte was the founder of positivism, influenced by utopian socialist Henri Saint-Simon and was a great influence on 19th-century thought. Comte influenced Karl Marx, John Stuart Mill etc. The word "altruism" is attributed to Comte for being the originator. Again altruism ("you before me" which eventually empties the "me=I" (individual immersing into the collective). TODAY'S SOCIETAL THINKING IS CULT LIKE. Same goes with "diversity" which is yet another form of collectivism under the guise of "individuals in community being different" (but in actuality sameness is promoted under "equality") and is put forth via soft persuasion with undertones of "if you are against it = you are a bad person" and social disapproval ensues. This influence is man...
This system who we pledge allegiance to even without knowing it is reflecting it's worldview / agenda that is manipulating our thoughts and raping the original sacred polarity of a conscious being. The dreams will reflect and intensify as the invitation to this archetypal level is incresing. As the participant in creation comes back to senses and sees everything in original light, the interplay between polarities restores itself in one's unique perspective. It is not even a question anymore. Let's play ;-)
Love is a direct relationship with the source of pure potential (call it zero-point in physics or chi or whatever word points best for your analytical mind to process these words, yet it is past analyzing). Discernment (to know true from false) is the NATURAL filtering mechanism that filters out everything that is false in you and responds to everything that hold true to you. Truth and beauty can be embraced even in a dot. The whole itself contains those dots to re-frame a hologram as when the single dot has new potential, it mirrors itself to the whole. It does not need to have a meaning. Pure potential cannot be named, otherwise it would be this or that and not everything. We name things and give them meaning, but this is dangerous because the meaning starts to live a life of it's own and keeps us within defined parameters. The hologram changes when you change without conditions. It has to. The latest theories in physics hold this to be the case....
Kommentit
Lähetä kommentti